- Schedule 5 Concerns: During discussions on the Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 2) Bill 2025, significant concerns were raised by representatives of the First Nations about the implications of schedule 5, which grants police the power to cancel social security payments for individuals with outstanding arrest warrants. This was flagged as disproportionately impacting First Nations communities and vulnerable groups (Pages 11-14).
- Senator Lidia Thorpe’s Address: Senator Thorpe highlighted the mistrust that Aboriginal women have towards Centrelink, discussing issues of systemic violence and the need for clearer definitions of “threat” in legislative measures related to social security. She raised concerns that such measures might adversely affect Indigenous individuals, especially those protesting or engaged in community activism (Page 31).
- Government’s Position: Senator Katy Gallagher, responding to concerns, emphasized that decisions about what constitutes a threat would be made by the Minister for Home Affairs and not solely by law enforcement. This raised further questions from Senators, including concerns over biased information sources used in decision-making (Page 31).
- Legality and Impact on Aboriginal Women: Thorpe questioned the implications for Aboriginal women who may face restrictions on access to benefits tied to their activism or participation in protests. Gallagher clarified that benefit restrictions would only apply if charges were laid, thus attempting to mitigate direct punitive measures against those participating in lawful protests (Pages 31-32).
- Legal Advisory Concerns: Senator David Shoebridge raised concerns regarding reliance on potentially biased advice in ministerial decisions that may affect individual rights, especially for marginalized communities (Page 31).
- Discussion on Indigenous Rights and Legislative Power: The discussions highlighted tensions within the Senate regarding the balance of power in social security legislation and the need to protect individual rights, particularly in relation to Indigenous Peoples. There was an emphasis on the responsibility of the government to consider the historical context and current realities faced by Indigenous Australians when implementing such policies (Pages 6-30).
- Call for Inquiry: Senators called for a thorough inquiry into the legal and ethical ramifications of schedule 5, noting how its implementation could exacerbate existing vulnerabilities within First Nations communities (Pages 12-14).
- Senator Gallagher’s Rebuttal: While acknowledging the concerns, Gallagher defended the necessity of the measures to address serious crimes, stating that comprehensive data would guide decision-making processes regarding social security and legal implications (Pages 22-32).
- Ongoing Political Divide: The debate painted a picture of deep divisions within the parliamentary discourse regarding Indigenous affairs, particularly how policies can affect Aboriginal communities, reflecting broader tensions around justice, accountability, and the protection of rights in a contemporary context (Pages 6-30).
Discover more from GovSnacks
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
